When is someone guilty of eavesdropping according to Kentucky law?

In Kentucky law, a person is considered guilty of eavesdropping when they intentionally use any device to overhear or record a conversation without the consent of at least one party involved in the communication. This highlights the importance of intent and the use of devices to infringe upon someone’s privacy rights. Simply overhearing a conversation by accident does not constitute eavesdropping, because there is no intent or use of technology involved. Similarly, being a witness to a conversation (options A and C) does not violate privacy laws, since it does not involve the unauthorized use of devices or recording equipment. It's also crucial that informing the parties of the recording (option D) typically secures consent, thereby removing the likelihood of guilt regarding eavesdropping. Therefore, the defining factor for guilt in this context is the intentional usage of a device to capture conversation without consent, making option B the correct choice.